How we work
Disciplined by design. Human by nature.
Every engagement follows a documented method with clear steps, named owners and quality gates. Here is how we work, so you know what to expect from the first meeting to the last report.
Five principles behind every engagement
- Quality gatesEvery stage ends with a defined check that must pass before the next begins.
- Evidence over assertionWe show what was measured, tested or configured, not what we believe is true.
- Standards-alignedEach stage maps to the NIST, ISO and federal frameworks our clients answer to.
- Two-person reviewNo deliverable leaves the firm without a second qualified reviewer.
- Plain languageLeaders get decisions, not jargon: what matters, what it costs, what to do next.
01 · Cybersecurity consulting
TCC Assurance Lifecycle
Six phases that take an organization from an unclear scope to a secure, provable and continuously monitored environment. The same lifecycle runs every engagement, whether the goal is a FISMA authorization, CMMC certification, HIPAA or PCI DSS compliance, or a hardened Azure environment.
- 01Scope
- 02Assess
- 03Engineer
- 04Prove
- 05Authorize
- 06Monitor
Monitoring feeds the next cycle of scoping, so the program keeps improving.
-
01
Scope
Define the mission, systems, data and frameworks that apply, so effort goes where risk actually is.
How we do it- Interview leaders and system owners
- Inventory systems, data and data flows
- Confirm which frameworks apply
You receiveScope statement and boundary diagramAsset and data-flow inventoryEngagement charter with named ownersQuality gateScope and boundary signed by the system owner -
02
Assess
Measure the current state against every requirement, objective by objective, and rank the risk.
How we do it- Examine, interview and test against each requirement
- Review cloud and identity configuration
- Score and rank risk in business terms
You receiveGap assessment by requirementRisk register with likelihood and impactPrioritized remediation roadmapQuality gateFindings validated with your technical team before reporting -
03
Engineer
Close the gaps with working controls, not only paperwork.
How we do it- Harden configurations to recognized baselines
- Put identity, access and Zero Trust controls in place
- Turn on logging, monitoring and alerting
You receiveImplemented configurations, as code where possibleSystem security plan and policy setPOA&M for anything deferred, with dates and ownersQuality gatePeer-reviewed changes with a tested rollback plan -
04
Prove
Produce the evidence an assessor, examiner or auditor will actually test.
How we do it- Map evidence to every assessment objective
- Run a mock assessment the way the assessor will
- Crosswalk to every framework in scope
You receiveAssessor-ready evidence packageMock assessment reportControl crosswalkQuality gateIndependent internal quality review (two-person rule) -
05
Authorize
Guide you through the formal assessment, authorization or certification.
How we do it- Work alongside your assessor or authorizing official
- Answer findings quickly and clearly
- Brief leadership on residual risk
You receiveAuthorization package or assessment responseUpdated POA&MRisk acceptance briefing for leadershipQuality gateAuthorization, certification or attestation decision -
06
Monitor
Keep posture current so compliance is a daily state, not a yearly event.
How we do it- Watch controls and catch drift
- Keep the plan of action current every month
- Review risk with leadership every quarter
You receiveMonthly posture report and dashboardContinuous monitoring deliverablesAnnual program reviewQuality gateQuarterly leadership review of risk and progress
Used forFISMA and FedRAMPCMMCHIPAAPCI DSSBanking and GLBAAzure and Microsoft 365

We do not hand you a binder and leave. Our engineers sit with your team, fix what we find and stay until the evidence holds up.
True CyberChampion delivery team
02 · AI systems
TCC AI Delivery Standard
Seven steps that every AI use case passes through, scaled to its risk. Low-risk productivity tools move quickly; high-impact systems get full testing, executive approval and continuous monitoring. Clients can adopt this standard as their own AI governance procedure.
- 01Intake
- 02Classify
- 03Design
- 04Build
- 05Test
- 06Approve
- 07Monitor
The risk tier sets how much control each AI system needs
- Tier 1 · LowApplies when
Internal productivity with no sensitive data, human always reviews output
Controls requiredStandard guardrails, approved tools only, spot checks
- Tier 2 · ModerateApplies when
Sensitive data, or customer-facing content reviewed by a person
Controls requiredPrivacy review, evaluation report, human review of outputs, quarterly monitoring
- Tier 3 · HighApplies when
Affects rights, safety, money or eligibility, or acts with autonomy (high-impact AI)
Controls requiredFull TEVV and red-teaming, executive approval, human decision authority, continuous monitoring, incident playbook
-
01
Intake
Register the use case so nothing reaches production unseen.
How we do it- Capture purpose, owner and expected value
- Identify data sources and sensitivity
You receiveUse-case record in the AI inventoryNamed business and technical ownersQuality gateOwner and measurable value defined -
02
Classify
Assign a risk tier that sets the controls the use case must meet.
How we do it- Review privacy, impact and autonomy
- Assign a risk tier that sets the controls
You receiveRisk tier (1, 2 or 3) with rationaleRequired control set for that tierQuality gateTier approved by the AI governance lead -
03
Design
Decide how the system will work, where people stay in control, and how success is measured.
How we do it- Set acceptance thresholds up front
- Decide where people stay in control
You receiveDesign specificationControl and oversight planQuality gateDesign review by security, privacy and the business owner -
04
Build
Build securely with approved tools and the least data and privilege needed.
How we do it- Use approved models and platforms
- Least data, least privilege, secure by design
You receiveWorking system or configurationSystem card and documentationQuality gateCode and security review -
05
Test
Prove the system is accurate, safe and fair enough for its tier before anyone relies on it.
How we do it- Measure accuracy against ground truth
- Red-team for injection, leakage and misuse
You receiveEvaluation (TEVV) report with measured results and varianceResidual risk statementQuality gateMeets acceptance thresholds for its risk tier -
06
Approve
Make a documented, accountable decision to deploy, and prepare the people who will use it.
How we do it- Accountable sign-off, executive for Tier 3
- Train the people who will use it
You receiveApproval recordUser guide and trainingQuality gateSign-off by the accountable official -
07
Monitor
Watch performance in the real world, and retire the system when it no longer earns its place.
How we do it- Track accuracy, drift and incidents
- Reassess, and retire when it no longer earns its place
You receiveMonitoring dashboardQuarterly reviewQuality gateAnnual recertification 
People stay in control. Every step has a named human owner, and Tier 3 systems keep a person in the decision.
Aligned toNIST AI RMFISO/IEC 42001OMB M-25-21NIST SP 800-53
03 · AI workforce training
Capability Proof System
Six stages and four integrated frameworks that design, develop, deliver and prove AI skills, so organizations get capability, not just completion rates.
- Diagnose
- Design
- Develop
- Deliver
- Prove
- Sustain
-
01
Diagnose
Understand your policy, roles and baseline skills.
How we do it- Review your AI policy and tools
- Baseline what each role can do today
You receiveRole map and baselineQuality gateSigned Outcome Contract -
02
Design
Set outcomes and weight skills by role.
How we do it- Weight skills by role
- Agree outcomes you can measure
You receiveProgram designQuality gateDesign approved -
03
Develop
Build Work-Twin scenarios from real tasks.
How we do it- Build scenarios from your real tasks
- Review them with your leads
You receiveLabs and job aidsQuality gateScenarios reviewed by your leads -
04
Deliver
Hands-on labs where people produce first, then improve.
How we do it- Coaching in the room, on your own work
- Everyone launches a real work product
You receiveLaunched work productsQuality gateEvery participant launches a real work product -
05
Prove
Measure what people can now do.
How we do it- Compare before and after work samples
- Report measured improvement
You receiveEvidence ReportQuality gateMeasured improvement against baseline -
06
Sustain
Make the skill stick.
How we do it- Short follow-up drills at 30, 60 and 90 days
- Check that the skill stuck
You receiveSustainment reportQuality gate90-day review
See why traditional AI training fails, and how this system fixes it →
Transparency you can count on
What you will see, every week of the engagement
- Weekly statusProgress, risks and decisions needed, in plain language
- Named ownersA person, not a team inbox, for every deliverable
- Open findingsYou see every finding as we confirm it, with no surprises at the end
- Shared evidence trailEvery claim is backed by something you can check
Our detailed playbooks, templates and tools are part of every engagement and stay with the delivery team.


See how it fits your mission
Tell us what you are working toward. We will walk you through how we would deliver it.
True Cyber